When companies take public stances on controversial socio-political issues, they risk facing backlash from opposing individuals or groups. This chapter investigates how companies can effectively respond to such backlash by analyzing Generation Z’s perceptions of M&M’s and Target’s responses to their respective corporate social advocacy (CSA) backlashes through in-depth interviews. The findings reveal that Gen Z evaluates companies’ responses across three key dimensions: (1) transparency of the response, (2) the justification for the action taken, and (3) the tone of the response. Additionally, Gen Z expects companies to double down on their stances and clearly outline steps to uphold their commitments. These insights offer practical guidance for companies navigating backlash.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Corporate Social Advocacy (CSA) and Crisis Communication: Examining the Effectiveness of Crisis Responses to Backlash

  • Ruoyu Sun

摘要

When companies take public stances on controversial socio-political issues, they risk facing backlash from opposing individuals or groups. This chapter investigates how companies can effectively respond to such backlash by analyzing Generation Z’s perceptions of M&M’s and Target’s responses to their respective corporate social advocacy (CSA) backlashes through in-depth interviews. The findings reveal that Gen Z evaluates companies’ responses across three key dimensions: (1) transparency of the response, (2) the justification for the action taken, and (3) the tone of the response. Additionally, Gen Z expects companies to double down on their stances and clearly outline steps to uphold their commitments. These insights offer practical guidance for companies navigating backlash.