The Risk of Being Unreasonable: Coercion, Capacity, and the Violence of Rationalist Care
摘要
This chapter interrogates how “reasonableness,” capacity, and risk are operationalised to justify coercion or discharge. I show how administrative rationality misreads survival logic as pathology, and how capacity tests can erase context. Policy and practice reforms are proposed across four levels: structural funding and flexibility; cultural change in language and training; policy shifts from readiness to relational entry; and practitioner craft focused on listening, holding, and responding. The question is not whether people are reasonable, but whether systems are reasonable to the lives they claim to serve.