Scholarlink

This chapter looks at the deficiencies of the theoretical frameworks for modularity methodology in construction that are currently in use, emphasising important areas that are either poorly understood or not sufficiently covered. Even though the modularity methodology has made great strides in design, manufacturing, and assembly processes, some aspects, most notably reassembly, maintenance, and cultural perception, require more thorough theoretical integration to increase its efficacy and versatility. Reassembly is the first topic covered in the discussion, bringing to light the lack of theoretical focus on the methodical disassembly and repurposing of modular components. This feature is essential for increasing the lifespan of modular buildings, decreasing waste, and advancing circular economy principles. The chapter then moves on to maintenance, highlighting the necessity of frameworks that integrate modular design and planning with predictive, preventive, and corrective maintenance techniques. Modular buildings may lose their long-term performance, safety, and cost-effectiveness if this factor is not taken into account. Another important disparity is cultural perception, since user acceptance, industry customs, and societal attitudes all have a big impact on the uptake and success of modular construction. Social and cultural barriers that can impede implementation, such as reluctance to use non-traditional building techniques or false beliefs about their quality and durability, are often overlooked by many theoretical models currently in use. The chapter emphasises the value of creating more thorough theoretical frameworks that incorporate technical, operational, and sociocultural aspects by recognising and evaluating these gaps. Modularity methodology will be strengthened, its sustainability potential increased, and its acceptance in a variety of contexts improved by addressing these neglected areas. Future investigations and creative solutions targeted at addressing these significant theoretical flaws will be built upon this analysis.

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Gaps in Modularity Methodology Theoretical Frameworks

  • 章节

  • 发表日期：

    2026年

查看全文
  • Peter Adekunle,
  • Clinton Aigbavboa,
  • Opeoluwa Akinradewo

摘要

This chapter looks at the deficiencies of the theoretical frameworks for modularity methodology in construction that are currently in use, emphasising important areas that are either poorly understood or not sufficiently covered. Even though the modularity methodology has made great strides in design, manufacturing, and assembly processes, some aspects, most notably reassembly, maintenance, and cultural perception, require more thorough theoretical integration to increase its efficacy and versatility. Reassembly is the first topic covered in the discussion, bringing to light the lack of theoretical focus on the methodical disassembly and repurposing of modular components. This feature is essential for increasing the lifespan of modular buildings, decreasing waste, and advancing circular economy principles. The chapter then moves on to maintenance, highlighting the necessity of frameworks that integrate modular design and planning with predictive, preventive, and corrective maintenance techniques. Modular buildings may lose their long-term performance, safety, and cost-effectiveness if this factor is not taken into account. Another important disparity is cultural perception, since user acceptance, industry customs, and societal attitudes all have a big impact on the uptake and success of modular construction. Social and cultural barriers that can impede implementation, such as reluctance to use non-traditional building techniques or false beliefs about their quality and durability, are often overlooked by many theoretical models currently in use. The chapter emphasises the value of creating more thorough theoretical frameworks that incorporate technical, operational, and sociocultural aspects by recognising and evaluating these gaps. Modularity methodology will be strengthened, its sustainability potential increased, and its acceptance in a variety of contexts improved by addressing these neglected areas. Future investigations and creative solutions targeted at addressing these significant theoretical flaws will be built upon this analysis.