In this chapter, we explore how the passivity of mainstreamers inadvertently contributes to the erosion of democratic institutions. While reactionary groups deploy emotionally charged rhetoric to mobilize support and challenge democratic norms, mainstreamers hesitate to engage emotionally, even as the ideals they uphold come under threat. We identify a self-reinforcing cycle of passivity—a vicious cycle of tolerance, denial, and adherence—which dampens emotional expressiveness among mainstreamers, allowing reactionaries to escalate their rhetoric in both intensity and vocabulary. This growing asymmetry in emotional engagement emboldens reactionary groups, accelerating the erosion of democratic ideals. By framing democracy as an ethos sustained through institutional practices, we argue that overt emotional expression is crucial for its defense. We emphasize the need for mainstreamers to recalibrate their emotional expressiveness, to counteract reactionary strategies, inspire solidarity, and re-engage public discourse.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Cycles of Passivity: How Mainstreamers Unwittingly Enable Erosion of Democracy

  • Namrata Malhotra,
  • Maxim Voronov

摘要

In this chapter, we explore how the passivity of mainstreamers inadvertently contributes to the erosion of democratic institutions. While reactionary groups deploy emotionally charged rhetoric to mobilize support and challenge democratic norms, mainstreamers hesitate to engage emotionally, even as the ideals they uphold come under threat. We identify a self-reinforcing cycle of passivity—a vicious cycle of tolerance, denial, and adherence—which dampens emotional expressiveness among mainstreamers, allowing reactionaries to escalate their rhetoric in both intensity and vocabulary. This growing asymmetry in emotional engagement emboldens reactionary groups, accelerating the erosion of democratic ideals. By framing democracy as an ethos sustained through institutional practices, we argue that overt emotional expression is crucial for its defense. We emphasize the need for mainstreamers to recalibrate their emotional expressiveness, to counteract reactionary strategies, inspire solidarity, and re-engage public discourse.