Since the publication of Martin Weitzman’s famous paper (1974) which compared price- and quantity-based instruments, economists have been deliberating when marketable permits (a quantity instrument) are better than Pigouvian taxes (a price instrument). Theoretically, these are equivalent. However, Weitzman noted that this equivalence is true in a world of perfect information only: in a world where all agents are perfectly informed about anything they do. There is no such comfort in environmental protection policy. When deciding on a cap or on a Pigouvian tax rate, authorities can err and miscalculate the costs and benefits affecting the interested parties, i.e. firms and their neighbourhoods.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Postscript

  • Tomasz Żylicz

摘要

Since the publication of Martin Weitzman’s famous paper (1974) which compared price- and quantity-based instruments, economists have been deliberating when marketable permits (a quantity instrument) are better than Pigouvian taxes (a price instrument). Theoretically, these are equivalent. However, Weitzman noted that this equivalence is true in a world of perfect information only: in a world where all agents are perfectly informed about anything they do. There is no such comfort in environmental protection policy. When deciding on a cap or on a Pigouvian tax rate, authorities can err and miscalculate the costs and benefits affecting the interested parties, i.e. firms and their neighbourhoods.