This article explores the perceptions Finnish politicians hold on intelligence and Russia. Their concerns and perceptions regarding intelligence and understanding of Russia in the context are explored in the light of Finnish parliamentary discussions. Parliament debates (2018–2019) on the so-called intelligence legislation package are examined and contrasted with the later parliamentary discussions concerning the legislation to combat instrumentalised entry that was passed in 2024 in response to Russia’s actions. Legality and oversight issues dominate the discussion, while the changes in the threat environment are acknowledged. Intelligence organisations are seen as separate service providers in need of oversight. The deliberations furthermore reveal a significant change in the way Russia is seen and discussed, from subdued allusions to outspoken ‘threat-speak’.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Policysphere, Intelligence and Parliamentary Discussions on Russia in Finland 2018–2024

  • Joonas Sipilä,
  • Tuomas Husu

摘要

This article explores the perceptions Finnish politicians hold on intelligence and Russia. Their concerns and perceptions regarding intelligence and understanding of Russia in the context are explored in the light of Finnish parliamentary discussions. Parliament debates (2018–2019) on the so-called intelligence legislation package are examined and contrasted with the later parliamentary discussions concerning the legislation to combat instrumentalised entry that was passed in 2024 in response to Russia’s actions. Legality and oversight issues dominate the discussion, while the changes in the threat environment are acknowledged. Intelligence organisations are seen as separate service providers in need of oversight. The deliberations furthermore reveal a significant change in the way Russia is seen and discussed, from subdued allusions to outspoken ‘threat-speak’.