Scholarlink

This chapter integrates two empirical studies examining PM in executive coaching. Study One develops the CES, a validated 20-item tool measuring 7 coachee outcome domains, while Study Two tests the scale’s psychometrics and PM as a predictor. Findings indicate that higher PM—reflecting self-reflection, insight, and awareness—significantly enhances coaching effectiveness. The discussion links these results to existing literature identifying self-awareness as the mechanism connecting clinical PM constructs with organisational coaching models. Practical implications include using PM in coachee selection and programme design. Limitations include sample diversity, but the study positions PM as a transferable, valuable construct for coaching research and practice.

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Discussion

  • 章节

  • 发表日期：

    2026年

查看全文
  • Judit Orban

摘要

This chapter integrates two empirical studies examining PM in executive coaching. Study One develops the CES, a validated 20-item tool measuring 7 coachee outcome domains, while Study Two tests the scale’s psychometrics and PM as a predictor. Findings indicate that higher PM—reflecting self-reflection, insight, and awareness—significantly enhances coaching effectiveness. The discussion links these results to existing literature identifying self-awareness as the mechanism connecting clinical PM constructs with organisational coaching models. Practical implications include using PM in coachee selection and programme design. Limitations include sample diversity, but the study positions PM as a transferable, valuable construct for coaching research and practice.