Scholarlink

The paper explores some of the evidential implications of neuro-implants that assist or restore vision from the perspective of evidence law. As people with disabilities are disproportionately victims of crime, and often experience secondary victimisation during trials where their credibility is often questioned, these technologies raise the question of how evidence law should treat “technologically mediated” witness accounts.

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Visual Neuroprosthetics, Digital Humans and the Law of Evidence

  • 会议论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年

查看全文
  • Claudia González-Márquez,
  • Burkhard Schafer

摘要

The paper explores some of the evidential implications of neuro-implants that assist or restore vision from the perspective of evidence law. As people with disabilities are disproportionately victims of crime, and often experience secondary victimisation during trials where their credibility is often questioned, these technologies raise the question of how evidence law should treat “technologically mediated” witness accounts.