In the previous chapter, Leibniz’s oft-stated view that perfections were a certain “degree of reality” or “amount of essence” was left undeveloped, save the functional characterization according to which a perfection amounts to some type of disposition or capacity or power latent in the agent. Still, there is something more worth pursuing here, I think, and it concerns once again Leibniz’s relationship with the scholastics.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Being and Goodness

  • T. Allan Hillman

摘要

In the previous chapter, Leibniz’s oft-stated view that perfections were a certain “degree of reality” or “amount of essence” was left undeveloped, save the functional characterization according to which a perfection amounts to some type of disposition or capacity or power latent in the agent. Still, there is something more worth pursuing here, I think, and it concerns once again Leibniz’s relationship with the scholastics.