This chapter critically examines South Africa’s social protection system as a valuable case for bidirectional policy learning between the North and the South. Despite persistent socioeconomic inequality, South Africa’s welfare state coverage has grown significantly from under 10% to over 40% in recent years. This represents a significant reimagining of welfare’s role in negotiating political transitions and addressing historical racial injustices. The chapter highlights how the design of social transfers has generated self-reinforcing mechanisms, thereby cultivating beneficiary constituencies while addressing historical inequities. Post-apartheid South Africa also demonstrates how to significantly expand social protection while ensuring some degree of fiscal sustainability. By transcending reductionist considerations of economic rationality or constitutional imperatives, this chapter illustrates how contextual economic realities mediate policy efficacy and how policy design choices reflect broader normative commitments to social inclusion and rights. Consequently, it serves as a compelling case for learning for societies in the Global North grappling with historical injustices.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

South Africa’s Social Protection Innovations: Lessons in Bidirectional Policy Learning

  • Clement Chipenda,
  • Gift Mwonzora

摘要

This chapter critically examines South Africa’s social protection system as a valuable case for bidirectional policy learning between the North and the South. Despite persistent socioeconomic inequality, South Africa’s welfare state coverage has grown significantly from under 10% to over 40% in recent years. This represents a significant reimagining of welfare’s role in negotiating political transitions and addressing historical racial injustices. The chapter highlights how the design of social transfers has generated self-reinforcing mechanisms, thereby cultivating beneficiary constituencies while addressing historical inequities. Post-apartheid South Africa also demonstrates how to significantly expand social protection while ensuring some degree of fiscal sustainability. By transcending reductionist considerations of economic rationality or constitutional imperatives, this chapter illustrates how contextual economic realities mediate policy efficacy and how policy design choices reflect broader normative commitments to social inclusion and rights. Consequently, it serves as a compelling case for learning for societies in the Global North grappling with historical injustices.