Scholarlink

This paper introduces Ratio-Difference-based Anti-packet Triggering (RDAPT) method for vehicular Delay/Disruption Tolerant Networking (DTN). In RDAPT, nodes compare the ratio of duplicate bundles with that of observed bundles when receiving summary vectors. If the difference exceeds a threshold of 0.7, an anti-packet is generated; otherwise, the bundle is retained. Unlike conventional schemes in which only destinations issue anti-packets, RDAPT enables intermediate nodes to adaptively regulate recovery, thereby improving responsiveness to network dynamics. Simulations were conducted in Scenargie under different vehicle densities with considering Epidemic and Spray and Wait (SpW) routing. Results show that RDAPT combined with Epidemic achieves lower overhead than DTAG and conventional anti-packet schemes without introducing additional delay.While RDAPT combined with SpW consistently maintains delivery ratios above 0.9, substantially outperforming DTAG, but has moderately higher overhead. The evaluation results show that RDAPT offers a more balanced approach to anti-packet control, improving delivery robustness while effectively managing overhead in vehicular DTNs.

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

RDAPT: A Ratio-Difference-Based Anti-packet Triggering Method for Vehicular DTNs

  • 会议论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年

查看全文
  • Cedric Lee,
  • Hiroki Fukue,
  • Makoto Ikeda,
  • Leonard Barolli

摘要

This paper introduces Ratio-Difference-based Anti-packet Triggering (RDAPT) method for vehicular Delay/Disruption Tolerant Networking (DTN). In RDAPT, nodes compare the ratio of duplicate bundles with that of observed bundles when receiving summary vectors. If the difference exceeds a threshold of 0.7, an anti-packet is generated; otherwise, the bundle is retained. Unlike conventional schemes in which only destinations issue anti-packets, RDAPT enables intermediate nodes to adaptively regulate recovery, thereby improving responsiveness to network dynamics. Simulations were conducted in Scenargie under different vehicle densities with considering Epidemic and Spray and Wait (SpW) routing. Results show that RDAPT combined with Epidemic achieves lower overhead than DTAG and conventional anti-packet schemes without introducing additional delay.While RDAPT combined with SpW consistently maintains delivery ratios above 0.9, substantially outperforming DTAG, but has moderately higher overhead. The evaluation results show that RDAPT offers a more balanced approach to anti-packet control, improving delivery robustness while effectively managing overhead in vehicular DTNs.