This chapter presents a nuanced discussion of the grammatical and conceptual framing of “comics” within academic discourse. Marc Singer begins by interrogating the singular versus plural usage of the term “comics,” arguing that this linguistic ambiguity reflects deeper tensions in comics studies between treating comics as a unified medium and as a diverse set of cultural artifacts. His statement is met with a response from Bart Beaty, who expands the discussion into a broader critique of the field’s methodological and institutional development, arguing in favor of large-scale empirical studies and corpus-based research to complement close reading. Singer’s reply defends the value of interpretive methods while acknowledging the importance of methodological diversity.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Comics Is … Plural? No, Singular!—No—

  • Marc Singer,
  • Bart Beaty

摘要

This chapter presents a nuanced discussion of the grammatical and conceptual framing of “comics” within academic discourse. Marc Singer begins by interrogating the singular versus plural usage of the term “comics,” arguing that this linguistic ambiguity reflects deeper tensions in comics studies between treating comics as a unified medium and as a diverse set of cultural artifacts. His statement is met with a response from Bart Beaty, who expands the discussion into a broader critique of the field’s methodological and institutional development, arguing in favor of large-scale empirical studies and corpus-based research to complement close reading. Singer’s reply defends the value of interpretive methods while acknowledging the importance of methodological diversity.