This chapter explores the constitution-making processes in post-war Japan and Kosovo, highlighting both the advantages and limitations of U.S. involvement. While the American role brought stabilization by introducing legal frameworks, it also limited local voices. Japan’s Article 9 and Kosovo’s Article 126 reflect this dynamic by embedding demilitarization within the broader U.S. post-war vision. These constitutional constraints, however, raise broader questions about sovereignty, external influence, and whether such limitations remain viable in today’s evolving security environment. Ultimately, the chapter assesses the long-term implications of the U.S. role in constitution drafting of Japan and Kosovo for national identity, defense policy, and regional security.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Constitution Making in Japan and Kosovo

  • Arbenita Sopaj

摘要

This chapter explores the constitution-making processes in post-war Japan and Kosovo, highlighting both the advantages and limitations of U.S. involvement. While the American role brought stabilization by introducing legal frameworks, it also limited local voices. Japan’s Article 9 and Kosovo’s Article 126 reflect this dynamic by embedding demilitarization within the broader U.S. post-war vision. These constitutional constraints, however, raise broader questions about sovereignty, external influence, and whether such limitations remain viable in today’s evolving security environment. Ultimately, the chapter assesses the long-term implications of the U.S. role in constitution drafting of Japan and Kosovo for national identity, defense policy, and regional security.