This chapter examines military-inspired metaphors and hierarchical structures that shape the internal culture of the UNHCR. Staff often see themselves as “soldiers” who follow orders rather than as empowered professionals, reflecting a culture of obedience, emotional restraint, and deference to authority. Using case studies from the Rohingya and DRC crises, the analysis shows how mismatched deployments—“too many generals, not enough soldiers”—highlight the flaws of a top-heavy structure. Military language and rituals reinforce discipline and loyalty but can also suppress dissent, marginalise creativity, and hinder collaboration with partners and communities. Psychometric insights reveal a dominance of “Guardian” profiles, which value order and compliance over innovation. Hierarchy often distorts communication, with filtered feedback and risk-averse decision-making delaying responses. By framing refugee protection in soldier-like terms, UNHCR risks prioritising conformity and image over empathy, adaptability, and accountability, thereby undermining the effectiveness and humanity of its protection mandate.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Symbolic Soldiers: Military Metaphors and Hierarchical Culture

  • Martin Gottwald

摘要

This chapter examines military-inspired metaphors and hierarchical structures that shape the internal culture of the UNHCR. Staff often see themselves as “soldiers” who follow orders rather than as empowered professionals, reflecting a culture of obedience, emotional restraint, and deference to authority. Using case studies from the Rohingya and DRC crises, the analysis shows how mismatched deployments—“too many generals, not enough soldiers”—highlight the flaws of a top-heavy structure. Military language and rituals reinforce discipline and loyalty but can also suppress dissent, marginalise creativity, and hinder collaboration with partners and communities. Psychometric insights reveal a dominance of “Guardian” profiles, which value order and compliance over innovation. Hierarchy often distorts communication, with filtered feedback and risk-averse decision-making delaying responses. By framing refugee protection in soldier-like terms, UNHCR risks prioritising conformity and image over empathy, adaptability, and accountability, thereby undermining the effectiveness and humanity of its protection mandate.