The introductory chapter explains the origins and meanings of the term “Zimbabwe” in both history and culture and explores the archaeological and historical reconstruction of Zimbabwe’s stone-building tradition, emphasising the link between Zimbabwe sites and Shona communities. It highlights the interdisciplinary approach of historical archaeology, combining archaeological evidence, documents, and oral traditions. The development of four key state systems—Great Zimbabwe, Munhumutapa, Torwa, and Rozvi—is examined, tracing political shifts and cultural continuity. Geographic distribution and architectural typologies of Zimbabwe sites are analysed, revealing diverse construction styles and decoration patterns with symbolic meanings. The lack of a complete inventory of sites is highlighted—currently only about 38% are described—and the challenges in cataloguing due to destroyed, renamed, or unrecorded locations. It examines the uneven research history, from early antiquarians to modern archaeologists, and calls for collaborative conservation involving local communities. Furthermore, it addresses misconceptions from colonial-era narratives that downplayed local authorship and civilisation, reaffirming these structures as evidence of an advanced indigenous society. It documents their historical continuity, religious and political significance, and enduring role in cultural identity.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Introduction

  • Edward Matenga,
  • Anders Lindahl

摘要

The introductory chapter explains the origins and meanings of the term “Zimbabwe” in both history and culture and explores the archaeological and historical reconstruction of Zimbabwe’s stone-building tradition, emphasising the link between Zimbabwe sites and Shona communities. It highlights the interdisciplinary approach of historical archaeology, combining archaeological evidence, documents, and oral traditions. The development of four key state systems—Great Zimbabwe, Munhumutapa, Torwa, and Rozvi—is examined, tracing political shifts and cultural continuity. Geographic distribution and architectural typologies of Zimbabwe sites are analysed, revealing diverse construction styles and decoration patterns with symbolic meanings. The lack of a complete inventory of sites is highlighted—currently only about 38% are described—and the challenges in cataloguing due to destroyed, renamed, or unrecorded locations. It examines the uneven research history, from early antiquarians to modern archaeologists, and calls for collaborative conservation involving local communities. Furthermore, it addresses misconceptions from colonial-era narratives that downplayed local authorship and civilisation, reaffirming these structures as evidence of an advanced indigenous society. It documents their historical continuity, religious and political significance, and enduring role in cultural identity.