Contraceptive implants, including pre-loaded one-rod etonogestrel (ENG) and the two-rod levonorgestrel (LNG) implants, and contraceptive injectables, including 3-, 2-month and once-a-month formulations, are highly effective and safe, with pregnancy rates of 4 per 1,000 women-years [W-Ys]) for both implants and 6 per 100 W-Ys, for 3-month injectables. Both implants, as members of the long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) ‘family,’ contribute to reductions in the global maternal mortality ratio and unplanned pregnancy rate, which remain high mainly in low- and middle-income countries and settings. The contraceptive effectiveness of both implants is similar in efficacy to permanent surgical contraception. These contraceptives are extremely safe with few contraindications because they are progestin-only methods. They can be used by women with hypertension, diabetes, and current or past venous thromboembolism as well as by nulligravidas and adolescents, and during the postpartum and post-abortion periods. Notably, their use may induce profound endometrial atrophy, which can induce bothersome bleeding; this is the main cause of discontinuation. Cultural acceptance of the resulting menstrual patterns varies among women, highlighting the importance of regional considerations when promoting the most appropriate contraceptive methods.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Contraceptive Implants and Injectables

  • Luis Bahamondes,
  • Cassia T. Juliato,
  • M. Valeria Bahamondes

摘要

Contraceptive implants, including pre-loaded one-rod etonogestrel (ENG) and the two-rod levonorgestrel (LNG) implants, and contraceptive injectables, including 3-, 2-month and once-a-month formulations, are highly effective and safe, with pregnancy rates of 4 per 1,000 women-years [W-Ys]) for both implants and 6 per 100 W-Ys, for 3-month injectables. Both implants, as members of the long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) ‘family,’ contribute to reductions in the global maternal mortality ratio and unplanned pregnancy rate, which remain high mainly in low- and middle-income countries and settings. The contraceptive effectiveness of both implants is similar in efficacy to permanent surgical contraception. These contraceptives are extremely safe with few contraindications because they are progestin-only methods. They can be used by women with hypertension, diabetes, and current or past venous thromboembolism as well as by nulligravidas and adolescents, and during the postpartum and post-abortion periods. Notably, their use may induce profound endometrial atrophy, which can induce bothersome bleeding; this is the main cause of discontinuation. Cultural acceptance of the resulting menstrual patterns varies among women, highlighting the importance of regional considerations when promoting the most appropriate contraceptive methods.