The digitalization of administrative justice is presented as a tool to reduce costs and speed up procedures, improve the quality of administrative justice, despite limited budgets. For litigants, it allows for better access to the law and jurisdiction, a possible general obligation to transfer a case to a judge for dematerialization and the development of videoconferencing may change the quality of justice for certain litigants. Digitalization also affects the operation of courts and the work of judges. Therefore, the evolution towards “administrative cyberjustice” will only guarantee quality if its implementation and consequences are carefully monitored. Digital tools seem to be particularly suited in law for a number of tasks, such as standardization and revision of certain acts, “advanced” legal research, client contact or dispute resolution through special platforms, or “quantitative” justice. All of these tools are aimed to increase the productivity of lawyers, just as spreadsheets made it possible for all professions to use numerical data. The issue of digital transformation in terms of online court hearings is poorly researched from a scientific point of view. Most aspects that reveal the mechanism of re-exercising the right to participate in court hearings online are covered in regulatory legal acts, namely laws, instructions, etc.