Two Canoes and a Storm
摘要
The initial chapter establishes the theoretical foundation for the subsequent discussion. It employs the Brazilian metaphor “one foot in each canoe” to illustrate the book’s integration of two intellectual traditions: Brazilian Critical Tradition and Latin American Liberation Theology (LT). The text begins by examining the “Brazil-enigma” from the 1930s, utilizing the works of prominent scholars such as Caio Prado Jr., Francisco de Oliveira, and Roberto Schwarz. It then outlines the rise and fall of the national-developmentalist project and the subsequent “national disintegration.” The text then introduces LT as a theology rooted in the praxis and spiritual experience of the poor, where faith is not an abstract doctrine but rather a response to lived struggle. The text goes on to delineate the so-called “Evangelical storm,” a term used to describe the shift from rural popular Catholicism to urban Pentecostalism, which occurred as a consequence of Brazil’s failed modernization. The chapter posits that this evangelical experience, which has led to the rise of far-right groups, must be understood through the critical and theological lenses employed in the book.