This article is devoted to the comparison of algorithms for estimating the position and heading angle of the autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) relative to the stationary landing platform (SLP) using a short-range hydroacoustic system. The problem is mathematically formulated using the Bayesian framework. Three algorithms are compared. One of them involves non-inertial processing, while the other two take into account the accumulation of measurements during the AUVs movement. One of the two latter algorithms is implemented in a recursive scheme: the recursive iterative batch linearized smoother (RI-BLS), while the other one follows a non-recursive scheme: an algorithm based on factor-graph optimization (FGO). Simulation results comparing the root mean square errors (RMSE) for the AUV’s position and heading angle estimates are presented, evaluating the performance of the algorithms. These RMSEs are also compared with the Cramer-Rao lower bound.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Comparison of Algorithms for Estimating the AUVs Coordinates and Heading Angle in the Task of Approaching the Stationary Landing Platform

  • Vladislav Karaulov,
  • Oleg Stepanov,
  • Alexander Gruzlikov,
  • Yulia Litvinenko

摘要

This article is devoted to the comparison of algorithms for estimating the position and heading angle of the autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) relative to the stationary landing platform (SLP) using a short-range hydroacoustic system. The problem is mathematically formulated using the Bayesian framework. Three algorithms are compared. One of them involves non-inertial processing, while the other two take into account the accumulation of measurements during the AUVs movement. One of the two latter algorithms is implemented in a recursive scheme: the recursive iterative batch linearized smoother (RI-BLS), while the other one follows a non-recursive scheme: an algorithm based on factor-graph optimization (FGO). Simulation results comparing the root mean square errors (RMSE) for the AUV’s position and heading angle estimates are presented, evaluating the performance of the algorithms. These RMSEs are also compared with the Cramer-Rao lower bound.