The objective of this study is to evaluate which attributes, as viewed by investors, project managers, contractors, and consultants mostly influence the construction project’s performance. Based on the survey results, the study calculated the mean value to assess the importance of each attribute and ranked them based on the views of each interviewee. The results show six attributes with clear stakeholder consensus: Disputes between the parties in construction project (PA22); Quality of equipment and materials (PA24); Quality of construction design (PA25); Planning for construction projects (PO19), Plan to cooperate with suppliers (PA26) and Ability to absorb knowledge (PE12). In terms of theory, this study fills a void by synthesizing the multiple stakeholder perspective in a structured evaluation of construction project performance build on. In practice, they provide project managers, policymakers and industry practitioners with recommendations and ways of alleviating the tackling of dispute resolution process and supplier collaboration, as well as promoting knowledge sharing mechanisms. Research is needed to elucidate relationships of these attributes and investigate their micro and macro long-term effects on sustainable construction project management.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Assessing the Attributes Influencing Construction Project Performance from the Perspective of Different Stakeholders

  • Van Luy Tong,
  • Truong Van Luu

摘要

The objective of this study is to evaluate which attributes, as viewed by investors, project managers, contractors, and consultants mostly influence the construction project’s performance. Based on the survey results, the study calculated the mean value to assess the importance of each attribute and ranked them based on the views of each interviewee. The results show six attributes with clear stakeholder consensus: Disputes between the parties in construction project (PA22); Quality of equipment and materials (PA24); Quality of construction design (PA25); Planning for construction projects (PO19), Plan to cooperate with suppliers (PA26) and Ability to absorb knowledge (PE12). In terms of theory, this study fills a void by synthesizing the multiple stakeholder perspective in a structured evaluation of construction project performance build on. In practice, they provide project managers, policymakers and industry practitioners with recommendations and ways of alleviating the tackling of dispute resolution process and supplier collaboration, as well as promoting knowledge sharing mechanisms. Research is needed to elucidate relationships of these attributes and investigate their micro and macro long-term effects on sustainable construction project management.