Most car manufacturers require their suppliers to achieve at least capability level 2 in an Automotive SPICE® assessment. The VDA Guidelines provide additional expectations and interpretations for assessors regarding generic practices. However, organizations still struggle to interpret these generic practices, especially process performance objectives (GP 2.1.1). In this paper, members of the SoQrates Initiative from major automotive organizations present additional expectations, practical examples, and best practices for generic practices at level 2, based on numerous assessments and process improvement initiatives. The results provided should not be considered the only truth, but rather as support for assessors and organizations in their interpretation and implementation.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Interpretations of Automotive SPICE Generic Practices on Level 2

  • Elena-Flavia Povirnaru,
  • Damjan Ekert,
  • So Norimatsu,
  • Ralf Mayer,
  • Sascha Glasbrenner,
  • Alexander Feulner,
  • Brigitte Kurz-Grießnig,
  • Peter Lindermuth,
  • Svatopluk Stolfa,
  • Mary Roselind Michael,
  • Valeria Franzitta,
  • Vanessa Schumacher,
  • Rainer Dreves,
  • Andreas Gasch,
  • Richard Messnarz

摘要

Most car manufacturers require their suppliers to achieve at least capability level 2 in an Automotive SPICE® assessment. The VDA Guidelines provide additional expectations and interpretations for assessors regarding generic practices. However, organizations still struggle to interpret these generic practices, especially process performance objectives (GP 2.1.1). In this paper, members of the SoQrates Initiative from major automotive organizations present additional expectations, practical examples, and best practices for generic practices at level 2, based on numerous assessments and process improvement initiatives. The results provided should not be considered the only truth, but rather as support for assessors and organizations in their interpretation and implementation.