Part I was concerned with epistemic stances: epistemic attitudes to scientific ontology. In Part II we turn to metaphysical stances as they feature in biology: metaphysical positions construed as stances that can act as presuppositions of and influences on biological science. We shall consider three debates in the metaphysics of biology: that between functionalists and structuralists, that between punctuationists and gradualists, and that between reductionists and holists. I shall argue that in each case, the relevant positions ought to be construed as metaphysical stances rather than factual beliefs.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Introduction to Part II

  • Sandy C. Boucher

摘要

Part I was concerned with epistemic stances: epistemic attitudes to scientific ontology. In Part II we turn to metaphysical stances as they feature in biology: metaphysical positions construed as stances that can act as presuppositions of and influences on biological science. We shall consider three debates in the metaphysics of biology: that between functionalists and structuralists, that between punctuationists and gradualists, and that between reductionists and holists. I shall argue that in each case, the relevant positions ought to be construed as metaphysical stances rather than factual beliefs.