Scholarlink

This study investigates the content and face validity of the Conditionality and Impact Measurement for Zakat-CCT Programs (CIM-ZCCT) using various validity measures. Those measures are the Content Validity Ratio (CVR), Content Validity Index (CVI), modified Kappa statistic (K), and Face Validity Index (FVI) analyses. The expert panel included 13 professionals from universities, zakat institutions, and research institutes, specialising in economics and cash transfer programs. Five experts also evaluated face validity. The validation process involved 63 items across six key constructs which are the religious conditionality, education conditionality, health conditionality, employment conditionality, poverty reduction, and human capital development. The results showed robust content validity (N = 13, I-CVI 0.85–1, S-CVI = 0.98, CVR = 63 agreed items, K = 0.8401–1) and substantial face validity (N = 5, I-FVI = 1, S-FVI = 1). The CIM-ZCCT instrument provides valuable findings into zakat and CCT programs. Also, evaluating conditionality factors and their influence on poverty reduction and human capital development. Hence, this tool offers valuable guidance for policymakers, program designers, and researchers, supporting developments in program effectiveness and advancing social welfare initiatives.

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Evaluation of Content Validity and Face Validity of Conditionality and Impact Measurement for Zakat-CCT Programs Instrument

  • 会议论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年

查看全文
  • Mohd Suffian Mohamed Esa,
  • Hairunnizam Wahid,
  • Salmy Edawati Yaacob

摘要

This study investigates the content and face validity of the Conditionality and Impact Measurement for Zakat-CCT Programs (CIM-ZCCT) using various validity measures. Those measures are the Content Validity Ratio (CVR), Content Validity Index (CVI), modified Kappa statistic (K), and Face Validity Index (FVI) analyses. The expert panel included 13 professionals from universities, zakat institutions, and research institutes, specialising in economics and cash transfer programs. Five experts also evaluated face validity. The validation process involved 63 items across six key constructs which are the religious conditionality, education conditionality, health conditionality, employment conditionality, poverty reduction, and human capital development. The results showed robust content validity (N = 13, I-CVI 0.85–1, S-CVI = 0.98, CVR = 63 agreed items, K = 0.8401–1) and substantial face validity (N = 5, I-FVI = 1, S-FVI = 1). The CIM-ZCCT instrument provides valuable findings into zakat and CCT programs. Also, evaluating conditionality factors and their influence on poverty reduction and human capital development. Hence, this tool offers valuable guidance for policymakers, program designers, and researchers, supporting developments in program effectiveness and advancing social welfare initiatives.