Scholarlink

In the previous chapter, I argued that religion need not and, in fact, ought not be the focus of conversations and debates around the appropriateness of conscientious practice. At this juncture, it may be helpful to take stock of key points in the preceding chapters as a way of tracking the argument thus far. In Chap. 1 , I distinguished between two clusters of views that emerge in discussion of conscience in healthcare.

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Moral Responsibility: Why Autonomy Misses the Mark

  • 章节

  • 发表日期：

    2025年

查看全文
  • Bryan Pilkington

摘要

In the previous chapter, I argued that religion need not and, in fact, ought not be the focus of conversations and debates around the appropriateness of conscientious practice. At this juncture, it may be helpful to take stock of key points in the preceding chapters as a way of tracking the argument thus far. In Chap. 1 , I distinguished between two clusters of views that emerge in discussion of conscience in healthcare.