Tabular intermediate logics are intermediate logics characterized by finite posets treated as Kripke frames. For a poset \(\mathbb P\) , let \(L(\mathbb P)\) denote the corresponding tabular intermediate logic. We investigate the complexity of the following decision problem LogContain: given two finite posets \(\mathbb P\) and \(\mathbb Q\) , decide whether \(L(\mathbb P) \subseteq L(\mathbb Q)\) . By Jankov’s and de Jongh’s theorem, the problem LogContain is related to the problem SPMorph: given two finite posets \(\mathbb P\) and \(\mathbb Q\) , decide whether there exists a surjective p-morphism from \(\mathbb P\) onto \(\mathbb Q\) .  Both problems belong to the complexity class NP. We present two contributions. First, we describe a construction which, starting with a graph \(\mathbb G\) , gives a poset \(\textsf{Pos}(\mathbb G)\) such that there is a surjective locally surjective homomorphism (the graph-theoretic analog of a p-morphism) from \(\mathbb G\) onto \(\mathbb H\) if and only if there is a surjective p-morphism from \(\textsf{Pos}(\mathbb G)\) onto \(\textsf{Pos}(\mathbb H)\) . This allows us to translate some hardness results from graph theory and obtain that several restricted versions of the problems LogContain and SPMorph are NP-complete. Among other results, we present a 18-element poset \(\mathbb {Q}\) such that the problem to decide, for a given poset \(\mathbb {P}\) , whether \(L(\mathbb {P})\subseteq L(\mathbb {Q})\)  is NP-complete. Second, we describe a polynomial-time algorithm that decides LogContain and SPMorph for posets \(\mathbb T\) and \(\mathbb Q\) , when \(\mathbb T\) is a tree.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Tabular Intermediate Logics Comparison

  • Paweł Rzążewski,
  • Michał Stronkowski

摘要

Tabular intermediate logics are intermediate logics characterized by finite posets treated as Kripke frames. For a poset \(\mathbb P\) , let \(L(\mathbb P)\) denote the corresponding tabular intermediate logic. We investigate the complexity of the following decision problem LogContain: given two finite posets \(\mathbb P\) and \(\mathbb Q\) , decide whether \(L(\mathbb P) \subseteq L(\mathbb Q)\) . By Jankov’s and de Jongh’s theorem, the problem LogContain is related to the problem SPMorph: given two finite posets \(\mathbb P\) and \(\mathbb Q\) , decide whether there exists a surjective p-morphism from \(\mathbb P\) onto \(\mathbb Q\) .  Both problems belong to the complexity class NP. We present two contributions. First, we describe a construction which, starting with a graph \(\mathbb G\) , gives a poset \(\textsf{Pos}(\mathbb G)\) such that there is a surjective locally surjective homomorphism (the graph-theoretic analog of a p-morphism) from \(\mathbb G\) onto \(\mathbb H\) if and only if there is a surjective p-morphism from \(\textsf{Pos}(\mathbb G)\) onto \(\textsf{Pos}(\mathbb H)\) . This allows us to translate some hardness results from graph theory and obtain that several restricted versions of the problems LogContain and SPMorph are NP-complete. Among other results, we present a 18-element poset \(\mathbb {Q}\) such that the problem to decide, for a given poset \(\mathbb {P}\) , whether \(L(\mathbb {P})\subseteq L(\mathbb {Q})\)  is NP-complete. Second, we describe a polynomial-time algorithm that decides LogContain and SPMorph for posets \(\mathbb T\) and \(\mathbb Q\) , when \(\mathbb T\) is a tree.