We present the Term Paper Recommendation System (TPRS), a hybrid AI-powered platform designed to scaffold the development of academic term papers in distance education. Tailored for students in a Bachelor of Arts program in Culture and Social Sciences, TPRS dynamically integrates large language models (LLMs), expert- and knowledge-based recommendation engines, and sentiment-driven routing to provide personalized formative feedback. A multi-shot prompting technique simulates high-fidelity tutoring interactions, trained on real supervision logs. Our system prioritizes transparency, student autonomy, and pedagogical alignment by combining structured validation, explainable recommendations, and relevance-based literature suggestions. A pilot deployment involving 18 students showed statistically significant improvements in submission quality (Hedge’s g = 0.44, p < .05) and positive user reception across accuracy, usability, and trust dimensions, evaluated using the CRS-Que framework. This work contributes a modular, pedagogically informed approach to AI-supported academic writing, offering a promising direction for scalable, inquiry-driven support systems in higher education.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

TPRS: AI-Assisted Research Topic Refinement for Distance Learners

  • Nghia Duong-Trung,
  • Xia Wang,
  • Rahul Rajkumar Bhoyar,
  • Angelin Mary Jose,
  • Silke Elisabeth Wrede,
  • Lars van Rijn,
  • Theresa Panse,
  • Claudia de Witt,
  • Niels Pinkwart

摘要

We present the Term Paper Recommendation System (TPRS), a hybrid AI-powered platform designed to scaffold the development of academic term papers in distance education. Tailored for students in a Bachelor of Arts program in Culture and Social Sciences, TPRS dynamically integrates large language models (LLMs), expert- and knowledge-based recommendation engines, and sentiment-driven routing to provide personalized formative feedback. A multi-shot prompting technique simulates high-fidelity tutoring interactions, trained on real supervision logs. Our system prioritizes transparency, student autonomy, and pedagogical alignment by combining structured validation, explainable recommendations, and relevance-based literature suggestions. A pilot deployment involving 18 students showed statistically significant improvements in submission quality (Hedge’s g = 0.44, p < .05) and positive user reception across accuracy, usability, and trust dimensions, evaluated using the CRS-Que framework. This work contributes a modular, pedagogically informed approach to AI-supported academic writing, offering a promising direction for scalable, inquiry-driven support systems in higher education.