This chapter engages in a comparative exegesis of two 1960s mystics: Alan Watts told his workaholic generation, “don’t just do something—sit there”; while Abraham Joshua Heschel was deeply involved in combatting the political injustices which fundamentally contradicted the new emerging inner life: “it is not a thing that lends significance to a moment; it is the moment that lends significance to things.” Distinguishing between centripetal and centrifugal mysticisms brings a magnifying-glass to the prevailing reification which treats as real the consensus-abstraction of neuron, mechanism, and efficacy which could risk creating a culture of—in R.C. Zaehner’s words—“canned mysticism.”

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Is Canned Mysticism Compossible? Centripetal and Centrifugal Mysticism: When Does Vision Meet Practice?

  • Mark Juhan Schunemann

摘要

This chapter engages in a comparative exegesis of two 1960s mystics: Alan Watts told his workaholic generation, “don’t just do something—sit there”; while Abraham Joshua Heschel was deeply involved in combatting the political injustices which fundamentally contradicted the new emerging inner life: “it is not a thing that lends significance to a moment; it is the moment that lends significance to things.” Distinguishing between centripetal and centrifugal mysticisms brings a magnifying-glass to the prevailing reification which treats as real the consensus-abstraction of neuron, mechanism, and efficacy which could risk creating a culture of—in R.C. Zaehner’s words—“canned mysticism.”