Scholarlink

This paper explores how a Low-Code/No-Code (LCNC) platform can be used by non-technical users, such as educators, to design and deploy a Sequential Agent-Based Generative AI System to facilitate instructional design. The system deploys an LLM-based sequential workflow of AI agents to support educators in the first three stages of the ADDIE instructional design model: Analysis, Design, and Development. It follows a co-design, Human-In-The-Loop (HITL) approach, where AI agents guide instructional designers on needs analysis, content validation and generation, while allowing user intervention. The system also explores the role of self-checking agents for fact-checking, bias detection, and instructional quality review, based on specific prompts. However, the identified potential remains theoretical, requiring empirical validation through user testing to assess usability, effectiveness, and adoption by non-IT users.

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Generative AI Agents for Instructional Co-design: A Sequential Agent-Based Approach Using a Low-Code/No-Code Platform

  • 会议论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年

查看全文
  • Dimitrios Tolis,
  • Stylianos Mystakidis,
  • Ioannis Hatzilygeroudis,
  • Konstantinos Siozopoulos

摘要

This paper explores how a Low-Code/No-Code (LCNC) platform can be used by non-technical users, such as educators, to design and deploy a Sequential Agent-Based Generative AI System to facilitate instructional design. The system deploys an LLM-based sequential workflow of AI agents to support educators in the first three stages of the ADDIE instructional design model: Analysis, Design, and Development. It follows a co-design, Human-In-The-Loop (HITL) approach, where AI agents guide instructional designers on needs analysis, content validation and generation, while allowing user intervention. The system also explores the role of self-checking agents for fact-checking, bias detection, and instructional quality review, based on specific prompts. However, the identified potential remains theoretical, requiring empirical validation through user testing to assess usability, effectiveness, and adoption by non-IT users.