Do sociological dynamics, patterns, pressures, forces, complications, and influences shape, confine, constrain, cobweb, and limit media institutions and their operationalisation in certain definitive ways? Can media institutions outlive or outgrow the sociological dynamics, patterns, pressures, forces, complications, and influences in society in which they operate? These were the questions that propelled us to embark on this task of theorising an Odudu Ikpaisọñ media-sociology framework, which questions media independence, freedom, and autonomy in the face of over-enduring sociological dynamics tenable within the media’s sociological milieu. The philosophical thrust of our theorisation of this media framework is anchored on an African (specifically, Ibibio) cultural and philosophical belief that all human conduct, practices, and initiatives, including social institutions are subject to Odudu Ikpaisọñ, which constitutes and embodies societal dynamics, forces, influences, pressures, or powers that shape social realities and enforce certain levels of restraints. As social institutions whose daily survival is shaped and defined by deep levels of interactions/frictions they maintain with other social institutions, the media, in our estimation, are entangled/entwined with Odudu Ikpaisọñ, which, in philosophy and practice, limits their independence, freedom, and autonomy. We argued this position using the six interpretive sociological paradigms (social, political, legal, economic, professional, and cultural paradigms) we have developed in the work and which further helped us in entrenching a working model to situate our discourse. The interpretive paradigms and the model developed amplified our discussion on the overwhelming and extensive influences of Odudu Ikpaisọñ on all sociological spheres of media operationalisation of which we consider the media institutions to be entrapped without an escape route. From the arguments raised and sustained, we were able to come up with 11 axiomatic postulations, all suggesting that media institutions and their practices, processes, and effects are restrained, controlled or influenced by the Odudu Ikpaisọñ (sociological dynamics).

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Odudu Ikpaisọñ Media-Sociology Theory

  • Ubong Andem Obong,
  • Unwana Samuel Akpan,
  • Samuel Asicus,
  • Kingsley James Effiong

摘要

Do sociological dynamics, patterns, pressures, forces, complications, and influences shape, confine, constrain, cobweb, and limit media institutions and their operationalisation in certain definitive ways? Can media institutions outlive or outgrow the sociological dynamics, patterns, pressures, forces, complications, and influences in society in which they operate? These were the questions that propelled us to embark on this task of theorising an Odudu Ikpaisọñ media-sociology framework, which questions media independence, freedom, and autonomy in the face of over-enduring sociological dynamics tenable within the media’s sociological milieu. The philosophical thrust of our theorisation of this media framework is anchored on an African (specifically, Ibibio) cultural and philosophical belief that all human conduct, practices, and initiatives, including social institutions are subject to Odudu Ikpaisọñ, which constitutes and embodies societal dynamics, forces, influences, pressures, or powers that shape social realities and enforce certain levels of restraints. As social institutions whose daily survival is shaped and defined by deep levels of interactions/frictions they maintain with other social institutions, the media, in our estimation, are entangled/entwined with Odudu Ikpaisọñ, which, in philosophy and practice, limits their independence, freedom, and autonomy. We argued this position using the six interpretive sociological paradigms (social, political, legal, economic, professional, and cultural paradigms) we have developed in the work and which further helped us in entrenching a working model to situate our discourse. The interpretive paradigms and the model developed amplified our discussion on the overwhelming and extensive influences of Odudu Ikpaisọñ on all sociological spheres of media operationalisation of which we consider the media institutions to be entrapped without an escape route. From the arguments raised and sustained, we were able to come up with 11 axiomatic postulations, all suggesting that media institutions and their practices, processes, and effects are restrained, controlled or influenced by the Odudu Ikpaisọñ (sociological dynamics).