Scholarlink

Two competing models of social protection emerged at the end of the nineteenth century. The first was based on the principle of occupational solidarity, while the second relied on national solidarity. Both systems were concrete responses to the same imperative of social cohesion. However, the breakdown of the post-war Fordist compromise, the emergence of a new production paradigm, and the rise of new social risks progressively undermined the foundations of both models. In the name of alternative standards of productive efficiency, these models gradually gave way to new social protection frameworks, initially focused on maximizing employment.

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Those Who don’t Work, don’t Eat? Linking Social Security Schemes to Paid Labor or Citizenship

  • 章节

  • 发表日期：

    2025年

查看全文
  • Michel Lallement

摘要

Two competing models of social protection emerged at the end of the nineteenth century. The first was based on the principle of occupational solidarity, while the second relied on national solidarity. Both systems were concrete responses to the same imperative of social cohesion. However, the breakdown of the post-war Fordist compromise, the emergence of a new production paradigm, and the rise of new social risks progressively undermined the foundations of both models. In the name of alternative standards of productive efficiency, these models gradually gave way to new social protection frameworks, initially focused on maximizing employment.