This study focuses on optimizing the placement of diving planesDiving plane to minimize additional drag induced by these surfaces. The selected locations for investigation include the sail plane, eyebrow plane, and midline plane. To identify the most favorable positions for a diving planeDiving plane, each location, except sail plane, involves exploring five different configurations, while sail plane comprises nine configurations. The SHIPFLOWShipflowcomputational fluid dynamicsComputational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) (CFD) program, developed by FLOWTECH International AB, facilitates drag prediction through CFD simulations. The 2D representations of the eyebrow plane, midline plane, and sail plane were crafted using AutoCAD, and the SHIPFLOWShipflow software was employed to generate their 3D counterparts. The analysis of several simulations was conducted to discern the optimal diving planeDiving plane locations. The evaluation criteria encompassed the identification of locations with the minimum drag values and the smallest wake magnitudes at the trailing edges. The simulation outcomes for the bare hull are compared with experimental data sourced from the DARPA SUBOFF program, administered by the United States Navy, for validation purposes. Following a thorough analysis, it was concluded that the eyebrow planes positioned at 0.2, midline planes at 0.5, and sail planes at coordinates (0.75, 0.50) emerged as the most favorable locations for the diving planesDiving plane on the submarineSubmarine. This determination is grounded in the careful consideration of simulation results, which provides a comprehensive validation framework for the identified optimal locations.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Optimization of Forward Diving Plane Locations for a Fully Submerged Submarine

  • Shaidatul Natasha Jailin,
  • Syed Mohamad Najmi Syed Talib,
  • Iwan Mustaffa Kamal,
  • Muhammad Adli Mustapa,
  • Ahmad Makarimi Abdullah

摘要

This study focuses on optimizing the placement of diving planesDiving plane to minimize additional drag induced by these surfaces. The selected locations for investigation include the sail plane, eyebrow plane, and midline plane. To identify the most favorable positions for a diving planeDiving plane, each location, except sail plane, involves exploring five different configurations, while sail plane comprises nine configurations. The SHIPFLOWShipflowcomputational fluid dynamicsComputational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) (CFD) program, developed by FLOWTECH International AB, facilitates drag prediction through CFD simulations. The 2D representations of the eyebrow plane, midline plane, and sail plane were crafted using AutoCAD, and the SHIPFLOWShipflow software was employed to generate their 3D counterparts. The analysis of several simulations was conducted to discern the optimal diving planeDiving plane locations. The evaluation criteria encompassed the identification of locations with the minimum drag values and the smallest wake magnitudes at the trailing edges. The simulation outcomes for the bare hull are compared with experimental data sourced from the DARPA SUBOFF program, administered by the United States Navy, for validation purposes. Following a thorough analysis, it was concluded that the eyebrow planes positioned at 0.2, midline planes at 0.5, and sail planes at coordinates (0.75, 0.50) emerged as the most favorable locations for the diving planesDiving plane on the submarineSubmarine. This determination is grounded in the careful consideration of simulation results, which provides a comprehensive validation framework for the identified optimal locations.