Scholarlink

The first chapter investigates the many usages of “minor” as a classification of literature. It argues that “minor” is not only a posthumous literary-historical grouping, but a stance that writers adopt as they present themselves. The stance is particularly significant for many late Romantic writers, writing in the decade after 1824. The introduction separates the Romantic minor from the Romantic failure and the special case of Laetitia Elizabeth Landon.

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Introduction

  • 章节

  • 发表日期：

    2025年

查看全文
  • James Najarian

摘要

The first chapter investigates the many usages of “minor” as a classification of literature. It argues that “minor” is not only a posthumous literary-historical grouping, but a stance that writers adopt as they present themselves. The stance is particularly significant for many late Romantic writers, writing in the decade after 1824. The introduction separates the Romantic minor from the Romantic failure and the special case of Laetitia Elizabeth Landon.