This chapter critiques the foundational assumption in security studies about a strict distinction between internal and external uses of force that set the parameters for organizing the state’s instruments of violence between police and military forces. It shows how the claims about a blurring process between domestic and international security is grounded on the assumed overlapped boundaries of territory, community, and political authority. By problematizing the ontological status of borders, political authority, and community, the chapter sets the stage for analyzing how these categories serve to legitimizing particular forms of force deployment.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

“Blurring”, Rupture, and Exception: The Internal and External as Normative Discourse

  • David P. Succi Junior

摘要

This chapter critiques the foundational assumption in security studies about a strict distinction between internal and external uses of force that set the parameters for organizing the state’s instruments of violence between police and military forces. It shows how the claims about a blurring process between domestic and international security is grounded on the assumed overlapped boundaries of territory, community, and political authority. By problematizing the ontological status of borders, political authority, and community, the chapter sets the stage for analyzing how these categories serve to legitimizing particular forms of force deployment.