This chapter synthesizes the book’s findings on how community-based organizations (CBOs) prioritize socio-ecological concerns within contexts dominated by unsustainable production-consumption systems. Drawing on evidence from nineteen organizations across multiple sectors, it contrasts the coercive arrangements driving unsustainability with the ethical coordination mechanisms enabling CBOs to foster access to basic needs while respecting ecological boundaries. The chapter articulates how specific organizational characteristics—open design, autonomy-supportive settings, diverse value recognition, trust-building mechanisms, and nonviolent technologies—create self-reinforcing dynamics supporting socio-ecological priorities. Despite significant barriers, CBOs demonstrate concrete possibilities for organizing collective action differently. Their experiences carry implications for restructuring economic activities, transforming organizational management, and catalyzing broader social change. Addressing unsustainability requires reorganizing social arrangements steering collective action, fundamentally redirecting how humans relate to each other and non-human life.