In this chapter, four concrete measures are considered: First, the human rights tradition continues to react to experiences of injustice. The current legal practice in cases of human rights violations by or in religious and worldview-based communities should also be optimized to guarantee human rights. Second, states bear a duty to realize human rights. This duty does not stop at the gates of religious and worldview-based communities. Third, it is a research desideratum to compile a compendium with the contributions of religious and worldview-based communities in favor of or against human rights. Fourth, according to adaptation, an active dialogue in, with, and between religious and worldview-based communities about human rights or their position towards human rights needs to be pursued.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Final Remarks

  • Peter G. Kirchschlaeger

摘要

In this chapter, four concrete measures are considered: First, the human rights tradition continues to react to experiences of injustice. The current legal practice in cases of human rights violations by or in religious and worldview-based communities should also be optimized to guarantee human rights. Second, states bear a duty to realize human rights. This duty does not stop at the gates of religious and worldview-based communities. Third, it is a research desideratum to compile a compendium with the contributions of religious and worldview-based communities in favor of or against human rights. Fourth, according to adaptation, an active dialogue in, with, and between religious and worldview-based communities about human rights or their position towards human rights needs to be pursued.