This concluding chapter reflects on the ways in which twentieth-century Iraqi cultural governance has been explored in this book. It offers concluding remarks on how the governance of culture—encompassing heritage, identity, and historical narrative—represented a platform for negotiating political power and sovereignty throughout the period. Through the analysis and “bottom-up” reading of archival materials, media, and local responses across colonial, post-colonial, and authoritarian regimes, it demonstrates how culture was used both as a tool of domination and a space for resistance. This research moves beyond state-centric narratives and rhetoric of victimisation, emphasising Iraqi agency through microhistorical studies and literary methods, and tracing how local actors challenged and reshaped official cultural policies. It critiques the limitations of Western-dominated archival sources while advocating for the continuing decolonisation of knowledge production. It also contributes a flexible framework for cultural governance with relevance beyond Iraq, offering insight into the dynamic, often contested interactions among culture, power, and identity.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Conclusion

  • Madison Leeson

摘要

This concluding chapter reflects on the ways in which twentieth-century Iraqi cultural governance has been explored in this book. It offers concluding remarks on how the governance of culture—encompassing heritage, identity, and historical narrative—represented a platform for negotiating political power and sovereignty throughout the period. Through the analysis and “bottom-up” reading of archival materials, media, and local responses across colonial, post-colonial, and authoritarian regimes, it demonstrates how culture was used both as a tool of domination and a space for resistance. This research moves beyond state-centric narratives and rhetoric of victimisation, emphasising Iraqi agency through microhistorical studies and literary methods, and tracing how local actors challenged and reshaped official cultural policies. It critiques the limitations of Western-dominated archival sources while advocating for the continuing decolonisation of knowledge production. It also contributes a flexible framework for cultural governance with relevance beyond Iraq, offering insight into the dynamic, often contested interactions among culture, power, and identity.