Signal interruptions remain a critical challenge in drone operations, as losing connection to the operator can result in sudden, high-stress scenarios with potential safety implications. This paper presents an investigation using mobile eye-tracking technology to examine how both novice and experienced drone pilots allocate their visual attention when confronted with total signal loss. Fifty-six participants (11 experienced, 45 novice) completed a standardized flight task during which the drone’s connection was deliberately disrupted. Quantitative data, including heatmaps and eye-tracking metrics, provided evidence of pronounced differences between the two groups. Novices exhibited dispersed scanning patterns and slower recognition of critical alerts, suggesting higher cognitive load. In contrast, experienced pilots rapidly identified key alerts, indicated by shorter time to first fixation and more focused fixations on essential interface icons such as the signal-strength indicator. Qualitative feedback from post-flight interviews further supported these findings: novices reported confusion and a preference for larger, centrally placed notifications, whereas experienced pilots relied on ingrained scanning routines. Taken together, these results underline the importance of intuitive, attention-guiding user interfaces and targeted training interventions to enhance situational awareness and mitigate risks during unexpected signal-loss events.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Using Eye-Tracking Analysis to Detect Pilot Focus in Drone Interfaces During Signal Loss

  • Dimosthenis Minas,
  • Angelos Fotopoulos,
  • Michalis Xenos,
  • Christos Zotos

摘要

Signal interruptions remain a critical challenge in drone operations, as losing connection to the operator can result in sudden, high-stress scenarios with potential safety implications. This paper presents an investigation using mobile eye-tracking technology to examine how both novice and experienced drone pilots allocate their visual attention when confronted with total signal loss. Fifty-six participants (11 experienced, 45 novice) completed a standardized flight task during which the drone’s connection was deliberately disrupted. Quantitative data, including heatmaps and eye-tracking metrics, provided evidence of pronounced differences between the two groups. Novices exhibited dispersed scanning patterns and slower recognition of critical alerts, suggesting higher cognitive load. In contrast, experienced pilots rapidly identified key alerts, indicated by shorter time to first fixation and more focused fixations on essential interface icons such as the signal-strength indicator. Qualitative feedback from post-flight interviews further supported these findings: novices reported confusion and a preference for larger, centrally placed notifications, whereas experienced pilots relied on ingrained scanning routines. Taken together, these results underline the importance of intuitive, attention-guiding user interfaces and targeted training interventions to enhance situational awareness and mitigate risks during unexpected signal-loss events.