This chapter presents an objective method of estimating the price of liquidity risk in private capital markets—commonly termed discount for lack of marketability (‘DLOM’)—in the context of estimating the value of privately held capital assets. The method is derived from basic financial economic theory, the intimate logical relationship between liquidity risk and private capital market transaction costs, historical practices of transaction broker-advisor practices, and empirical data on merger and acquisition transaction fees. Transaction cost functions representing estimates of the price of liquidity risk in private capital markets are estimated for both a highly developed market economy and an (arguably) emerging market economy. An example of applying the method in the context of estimating the value of a privately held capital asset in Brazil is presented and, finally, the method is compared briefly to existing, subjective DLOM estimation methods.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Estimating Liquidity Risk Pricing and Transaction Costs in the Valuation of Privately Held Capital Assets in Emerging Markets

  • Malcolm McLelland

摘要

This chapter presents an objective method of estimating the price of liquidity risk in private capital markets—commonly termed discount for lack of marketability (‘DLOM’)—in the context of estimating the value of privately held capital assets. The method is derived from basic financial economic theory, the intimate logical relationship between liquidity risk and private capital market transaction costs, historical practices of transaction broker-advisor practices, and empirical data on merger and acquisition transaction fees. Transaction cost functions representing estimates of the price of liquidity risk in private capital markets are estimated for both a highly developed market economy and an (arguably) emerging market economy. An example of applying the method in the context of estimating the value of a privately held capital asset in Brazil is presented and, finally, the method is compared briefly to existing, subjective DLOM estimation methods.