Scholarlink

In this paper, we offer a novel account of epistemic priority, which we dub “inquisitive due diligence.” We then show how our account both outperforms the two prominent species of epistemic priority—Douglas’s inductive risk account and Steel’s values-in-science account—while also rebutting objections from the leading critic of epistemic priority, the infamous Matthew J. Brown. We illustrate these points using examples from segregation research in the 1980s.

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Inquiry and Epistemic Priority: Lessons from Segregation Research

  • 章节

  • 发表日期：

    2025年

查看全文
  • Kareem Khalifa,
  • Jared Millson,
  • Mark Risjord

摘要

In this paper, we offer a novel account of epistemic priority, which we dub “inquisitive due diligence.” We then show how our account both outperforms the two prominent species of epistemic priority—Douglas’s inductive risk account and Steel’s values-in-science account—while also rebutting objections from the leading critic of epistemic priority, the infamous Matthew J. Brown. We illustrate these points using examples from segregation research in the 1980s.