This chapter leaps to Cuba—home to the talented and internationally acclaimed Sara (Sarita) Gómez, born in Gaunabacao, Havana. On July 1974 Gómez passed away at the age of thirty-one as a result of the chronic asthma with which she had struggled since birth. Gómez’s 1970 definitional-oriented articulation of Documentary was given in an interview with Pensamiento Critico (Vol. 42, July 1970) entitled “Los Documentalistas y Sus Convicciones” (“The Documentarians and Their Convictions”). The chapter studies this article in the context of the awakening of a Latin American voice in filmmaking, cinema studies, and politics. Gómez begins her manifesto-like enunciation with eleven premises on cinema. She then focuses on the unshakable bond between a filmmaker and her audience, to which the chapter refers as her “definitional moment.” In her closing words, she has this to say about Documentary: “A cinema that is capable of expressing contradictions and with an aim to help make all of us capable of considering life as an eternal conflict against mediocracy, a conflict that we must win. Is this too ambitious? Can we do it? This must be our aim.” I ask: “Is Gómez a blind, fanatical revolutionist, drowning in wishful thinking, and hence utopianizing Documentary?” The chapter attempts to provide a picture of her definiens that suggests a different perspective, one of sheer striving toward Documentary arête.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

1970 Sara (Sarita) Gómez

  • Dan Geva

摘要

This chapter leaps to Cuba—home to the talented and internationally acclaimed Sara (Sarita) Gómez, born in Gaunabacao, Havana. On July 1974 Gómez passed away at the age of thirty-one as a result of the chronic asthma with which she had struggled since birth. Gómez’s 1970 definitional-oriented articulation of Documentary was given in an interview with Pensamiento Critico (Vol. 42, July 1970) entitled “Los Documentalistas y Sus Convicciones” (“The Documentarians and Their Convictions”). The chapter studies this article in the context of the awakening of a Latin American voice in filmmaking, cinema studies, and politics. Gómez begins her manifesto-like enunciation with eleven premises on cinema. She then focuses on the unshakable bond between a filmmaker and her audience, to which the chapter refers as her “definitional moment.” In her closing words, she has this to say about Documentary: “A cinema that is capable of expressing contradictions and with an aim to help make all of us capable of considering life as an eternal conflict against mediocracy, a conflict that we must win. Is this too ambitious? Can we do it? This must be our aim.” I ask: “Is Gómez a blind, fanatical revolutionist, drowning in wishful thinking, and hence utopianizing Documentary?” The chapter attempts to provide a picture of her definiens that suggests a different perspective, one of sheer striving toward Documentary arête.