This chapter asks us to distinguish between force and coercion: while the former should be understood in a broad sense, as ways in which a person impedes, or compels the action of others, the latter should be understood in a moralised sense as an infringement of a person’s right. Based on this distinction the contribution unveils the binary nature of force within interpersonal encounters, concluding that the point of law is to ensure that no-one coerces another within a political community. The fundamental question that law answers is who gets to force whom.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Force, Coercion, and the Law: A Philosophical Framework

  • George Letsas

摘要

This chapter asks us to distinguish between force and coercion: while the former should be understood in a broad sense, as ways in which a person impedes, or compels the action of others, the latter should be understood in a moralised sense as an infringement of a person’s right. Based on this distinction the contribution unveils the binary nature of force within interpersonal encounters, concluding that the point of law is to ensure that no-one coerces another within a political community. The fundamental question that law answers is who gets to force whom.