Scholarlink

Lakatos’s seminal work Proofs and Refutations depends heavily on counter-examples and refutations. In this work, I argue that the said dependancy goes further than anticipated, rendering Proofs and Refutations a working example of paraconsistent reasoning in mathematical methodology. I also maintain that Proofs and Refutations is an example of paraconsistent reasoning with strategies, making it an example of game theoretical and strategic reasoning in mathematical methodology.

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Proofs and Refutations, Non-classically and Game Theoretically

  • 章节

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年

查看全文
  • Can Başkent

摘要

Lakatos’s seminal work Proofs and Refutations depends heavily on counter-examples and refutations. In this work, I argue that the said dependancy goes further than anticipated, rendering Proofs and Refutations a working example of paraconsistent reasoning in mathematical methodology. I also maintain that Proofs and Refutations is an example of paraconsistent reasoning with strategies, making it an example of game theoretical and strategic reasoning in mathematical methodology.