Electrosurgery equipment calibration is essential for maintaining safety and effectiveness in medical procedures, ensuring that devices function correctly and predictably. Accurate calibration minimizes risks and enhances patient outcomes by guaranteeing that electrosurgical tools operate within specified parameters. This study investigates the comparative performance of manual versus automated calibration techniques, focusing on two critical metrics: uncertainty and time efficiency. Through a comprehensive analysis, the results reveal that automated calibration techniques significantly outperform manual methods. Specifically, automated systems achieve a higher degree of precision and reliability, resulting in a narrower uncertainty interval. Additionally, the calibration process is completed approximately three times faster with automation. These advancements highlight the advantages of integrating automated calibration processes into clinical practice. By adopting automated methods, clinical engineering environments can experience improved accuracy, increased productivity, and enhanced safety, ultimately contributing to better patient care and more efficient operation of electrosurgical equipment.