This study explores the impact of state political climates on the health and well-being of LGBTQ individuals in the U.S. Southeast, a region characterized by heightened anti-LGBTQ rhetoric and legislative activity. Employing a political determinants of health framework, this research investigates how both cultural and structural factors contribute to health disparities among gender and sexual minorities. The findings reveal that perceived political hostility significantly affects physical and mental health outcomes, with LGBTQ Southerners overwhelmingly reporting their state climates as hostile. Perceived hostility was found to correlate with poorer health outcomes, while more supportive state political climates were associated with improved health. Interestingly, objective measures of LGBTQ policy did not show a significant relationship with health outcomes, highlighting the importance of subjective experiences in understanding the full impact of the political environment. The study underscores the limitations of cultural competency interventions when not paired with structural change, emphasizing the need for both inclusive healthcare practices and systemic reforms to achieve health equity. By fostering a supportive sociopolitical environment, policymakers, healthcare providers, and advocates can help mitigate minority stress and improve health outcomes for LGBTQ populations in the region.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

The Political Determinants of LGBTQ Health in the U.S. Southeast

  • Tiara Giddings,
  • Chase Harless,
  • Tierra James,
  • Jurni Tollerson,
  • Austin H. Johnson

摘要

This study explores the impact of state political climates on the health and well-being of LGBTQ individuals in the U.S. Southeast, a region characterized by heightened anti-LGBTQ rhetoric and legislative activity. Employing a political determinants of health framework, this research investigates how both cultural and structural factors contribute to health disparities among gender and sexual minorities. The findings reveal that perceived political hostility significantly affects physical and mental health outcomes, with LGBTQ Southerners overwhelmingly reporting their state climates as hostile. Perceived hostility was found to correlate with poorer health outcomes, while more supportive state political climates were associated with improved health. Interestingly, objective measures of LGBTQ policy did not show a significant relationship with health outcomes, highlighting the importance of subjective experiences in understanding the full impact of the political environment. The study underscores the limitations of cultural competency interventions when not paired with structural change, emphasizing the need for both inclusive healthcare practices and systemic reforms to achieve health equity. By fostering a supportive sociopolitical environment, policymakers, healthcare providers, and advocates can help mitigate minority stress and improve health outcomes for LGBTQ populations in the region.