This paper is concerned with disjunctions of universal modals, such as You have to clean your room or you have to walk the dog, and disjunctions of conditionals, such as If Alice dances, Charlie will dance, or if Bob dances, Charlie will dance. We aim to provide a uniform account of their surprising behaviour. Our proposal combines three independently attested components. Firstly, disjunction’s dynamic effect, familiar from presupposition projection: when we evaluate a disjunction \(A \vee B\) , we typically interpret B assuming the negation of A, and optionally, also interpret A assuming the negation of B. Secondly, the fact that disjunctions often receive a conjunctive interpretation, familiar from free choice phenomena. Thirdly, that modal bases are restricted to local contexts, what Mandelkern has called ‘bounded modality’.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Disjunctions of Universal Modals and Conditionals

  • Dean McHugh

摘要

This paper is concerned with disjunctions of universal modals, such as You have to clean your room or you have to walk the dog, and disjunctions of conditionals, such as If Alice dances, Charlie will dance, or if Bob dances, Charlie will dance. We aim to provide a uniform account of their surprising behaviour. Our proposal combines three independently attested components. Firstly, disjunction’s dynamic effect, familiar from presupposition projection: when we evaluate a disjunction \(A \vee B\) , we typically interpret B assuming the negation of A, and optionally, also interpret A assuming the negation of B. Secondly, the fact that disjunctions often receive a conjunctive interpretation, familiar from free choice phenomena. Thirdly, that modal bases are restricted to local contexts, what Mandelkern has called ‘bounded modality’.