The Joint Spectrum Center (JSC) Equipment, Tactical, and Space (JETS) database contains 9,539 satellite records. When new data is ingested the satellite orbit type needs to be identified, which is currently a manual process. To save time, this work explores automating the process using machine learning. Several statistical machine learning and neural network models were developed and compared using the weighted averages of precision, recall, and F1 score metrics. The number of records used in training and testing was 1,024 with a 60/20/20 train, validation, and test split. Six orbital parameters were initially used to fit the models, but three parameters (the mean motion, eccentricity, and inclination) were most important in determining orbit type. A decision tree model with the three most important orbital parameters as inputs best identified the seven target orbit types. The weighted averages of the precision, recall, and F1 score on the test data were 0.991, 0.990, and 0.990 respectively. This compared favorably to the F1 metrics for a random classifier (0.106) and a model that always predicted the majority class (0.103).

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Multi-class Classification of Satellite Orbits for Database Quality Control

  • Richard Peterson,
  • Torrey Wagner,
  • Paul Auclair,
  • Brent Langhals

摘要

The Joint Spectrum Center (JSC) Equipment, Tactical, and Space (JETS) database contains 9,539 satellite records. When new data is ingested the satellite orbit type needs to be identified, which is currently a manual process. To save time, this work explores automating the process using machine learning. Several statistical machine learning and neural network models were developed and compared using the weighted averages of precision, recall, and F1 score metrics. The number of records used in training and testing was 1,024 with a 60/20/20 train, validation, and test split. Six orbital parameters were initially used to fit the models, but three parameters (the mean motion, eccentricity, and inclination) were most important in determining orbit type. A decision tree model with the three most important orbital parameters as inputs best identified the seven target orbit types. The weighted averages of the precision, recall, and F1 score on the test data were 0.991, 0.990, and 0.990 respectively. This compared favorably to the F1 metrics for a random classifier (0.106) and a model that always predicted the majority class (0.103).