This conclusion synthesises the analysis of political correctness (PC) in academia, emphasizing the pivotal roles played by academics and university administrators in driving and sustaining PC. Grounded in public choice theory (PCT), it elucidates how rational and self-interested behaviour, underpinned by broad egoism, leads these actors to foster PC as a tool for professional and ideological advantage. By leveraging models such as rent-seeking, the logic of collective action and expressive behaviour, the work explains the mechanisms behind the establishment and resilience of PC in research, curricula, affirmative action and speech codes policies. The findings suggest that PC-driven minority groups are highly effective at mobilisation and rent-seeking due to advantages in collective action and alignment with liberal values, while opponents face prohibitive costs. Consequently, significant challenges to PC are unlikely to arise from within academia, with external interventions, such as governmental or political transformations, representing the most plausible avenues for change. The book offers a nuanced understanding of PC as both a regulatory phenomenon and an ideological mechanism safeguarding liberal values, providing critical insights for policymakers and analysts addressing its implications for academic freedom and institutional integrity.