This paper presents a comparative analysis of the integration of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Circular Economy (CE) principles in architectural education, focusing on universities in Belarus and China. The research addresses the growing importance of sustainability in the architectural field and the role of education in preparing future architects for environmentally responsible practice. Through a case study approach, the paper investigates the feedback of students mastering architecture in China and Belarus, teaching methods, and practical applications related to LCA and CE in architectural programs at selected universities in Belarus and China. The study aims to identify similarities, differences, challenges, and best practices in integrating LCA and CE into architectural education, considering both countries’ cultural, economic, and regulatory contexts. The findings provide insights into the current state of sustainability education in architecture and offer recommendations for advancing the integration of LCA and CE principles in architectural curricula. This comparative analysis contributes to the ongoing dialogue on promoting sustainable design practices and fostering a culture of environmental stewardship within architectural education globally.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Pursuing Comparative Analysis of Life Cycle Assessment and Circular Economy Integration in Architectural Education: A Case Study of Universities in Belarus and China

  • Siarhei Zenchanka,
  • Anna Gorbatcheva,
  • Zhang Pengfei

摘要

This paper presents a comparative analysis of the integration of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Circular Economy (CE) principles in architectural education, focusing on universities in Belarus and China. The research addresses the growing importance of sustainability in the architectural field and the role of education in preparing future architects for environmentally responsible practice. Through a case study approach, the paper investigates the feedback of students mastering architecture in China and Belarus, teaching methods, and practical applications related to LCA and CE in architectural programs at selected universities in Belarus and China. The study aims to identify similarities, differences, challenges, and best practices in integrating LCA and CE into architectural education, considering both countries’ cultural, economic, and regulatory contexts. The findings provide insights into the current state of sustainability education in architecture and offer recommendations for advancing the integration of LCA and CE principles in architectural curricula. This comparative analysis contributes to the ongoing dialogue on promoting sustainable design practices and fostering a culture of environmental stewardship within architectural education globally.