Stanislavsky’s approaches to directing in the mid-to-late 1920s and the role improvisation played therein are discussed. A key concern for Stanislavsky during this politically significant time was the interpretation of a piece, which in theatre terms revolves around the identification of a throughaction that traverses a play and performance. The one key work aspect that was resolved through improvisation was the creation of the mise-en-scène. It was, however, a very different mise-en-scène from the one that had made Stanislavsky’s reputation as a highly creative director. By now he was totally committed to an actor’s theatre, which meant that the mise-en-scène was less fixed and more fluid, emerging from the improvisations of the actors on the actual stage, late in the rehearsal process, and when they encountered sets, props, furniture arrangements, and so on. The chapter identifies these improvisations, rooted as they were in the actor’s ‘here, today, now’, as a key stepping stone towards Active Analysis and Stanislavsky’s final legacies.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Fourth Phase: 1924–28 and Stanislavsky’s Final Legacies of the 1930s

  • Stefan Aquilina

摘要

Stanislavsky’s approaches to directing in the mid-to-late 1920s and the role improvisation played therein are discussed. A key concern for Stanislavsky during this politically significant time was the interpretation of a piece, which in theatre terms revolves around the identification of a throughaction that traverses a play and performance. The one key work aspect that was resolved through improvisation was the creation of the mise-en-scène. It was, however, a very different mise-en-scène from the one that had made Stanislavsky’s reputation as a highly creative director. By now he was totally committed to an actor’s theatre, which meant that the mise-en-scène was less fixed and more fluid, emerging from the improvisations of the actors on the actual stage, late in the rehearsal process, and when they encountered sets, props, furniture arrangements, and so on. The chapter identifies these improvisations, rooted as they were in the actor’s ‘here, today, now’, as a key stepping stone towards Active Analysis and Stanislavsky’s final legacies.