Aseptic loosening in total hip arthroplasty (THA) presents a significant challenge to orthopedic surgeons. Factors such as inadequate initial fixation, mechanical instability, and biological processes like particle-induced osteolysis contribute to its development. Diagnosis involves a combination of patient history, clinical examination, and imaging studies with dynamic CT scans offering enhanced sensitivity and specificity in detecting loose components. Differentiating between septic and aseptic loosening is critical, followed by prompt intervention to prevent further complications. Various surgical approaches and techniques—standard anterior, lateral and posterior approach, extended trochanteric osteotomies (ETOs)—are employed based on the extent of loosening and patient-specific factors. Postoperative management focuses on pain management, rehabilitation, and optimizing functional outcomes, similar to primary THA. Despite advancements in surgical methodologies, managing aseptic loosening in revision THA remains challenging as outcomes are inferior to primary THA despite similar survivorship. Factors such as pain levels, body mass index (BMI), and the extent of acetabular bone involvement appear to play a role. The author’s preference is a direct lateral approach with careful consideration of implant selection and fixation methods to achieve optimal outcomes.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Aseptic Loosening

  • Antonia F. Chen,
  • Roxana Martinez

摘要

Aseptic loosening in total hip arthroplasty (THA) presents a significant challenge to orthopedic surgeons. Factors such as inadequate initial fixation, mechanical instability, and biological processes like particle-induced osteolysis contribute to its development. Diagnosis involves a combination of patient history, clinical examination, and imaging studies with dynamic CT scans offering enhanced sensitivity and specificity in detecting loose components. Differentiating between septic and aseptic loosening is critical, followed by prompt intervention to prevent further complications. Various surgical approaches and techniques—standard anterior, lateral and posterior approach, extended trochanteric osteotomies (ETOs)—are employed based on the extent of loosening and patient-specific factors. Postoperative management focuses on pain management, rehabilitation, and optimizing functional outcomes, similar to primary THA. Despite advancements in surgical methodologies, managing aseptic loosening in revision THA remains challenging as outcomes are inferior to primary THA despite similar survivorship. Factors such as pain levels, body mass index (BMI), and the extent of acetabular bone involvement appear to play a role. The author’s preference is a direct lateral approach with careful consideration of implant selection and fixation methods to achieve optimal outcomes.